An Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestley – Themes, Characters, and Detailed Analysis

Also Read

 (toc) #title= (Table of Content)

Introduction

An Inspector Calls is a three-act play written by J.B. Priestley in 1945 and first performed in 1946. Set in 1912, the play critiques Edwardian society’s class divisions, selfish individualism, and moral hypocrisy. Priestley, a staunch socialist, wrote it as a warning for post-war Britain, urging audiences to embrace collective responsibility and reject complacency.

The drama remains one of the most studied plays in modern English literature, blending social critique, morality play, and detective mystery into a gripping narrative.

---

Plot Overview

The play unfolds in the Birling family’s dining room, where Arthur Birling, his wife Sybil, daughter Sheila, son Eric, and Sheila’s fiancé Gerald Croft are celebrating an engagement. The evening is interrupted by the arrival of Inspector Goole, who investigates the suicide of a young working-class woman named Eva Smith.

As the Inspector interrogates each character, their individual roles in Eva’s downfall are revealed:

• Arthur Birling – Fired Eva from his factory for leading a strike.
• Sheila Birling – Got her dismissed from a shop out of jealousy.
• Gerald Croft – Had an affair with her when she became “Daisy Renton.”
• Sybil Birling – Denied her help through a charity committee.
• Eric Birling – Exploited her while drunk, leaving her pregnant.

The Inspector delivers a final speech on social responsibility, warning that ignoring society’s vulnerable will lead to “fire and blood and anguish.” The family splits: Sheila and Eric accept their guilt, while Arthur and Sybil dismiss the Inspector’s authority—until a phone call reveals that a real inspector is on his way about a girl’s suicide.

Perfect — let’s expand the article with an Act-by-Act analysis of An Inspector Calls, making it academic and SEO-optimized. This breakdown will help readers, especially students, find detailed insights for essays and exams.

An Inspector Calls Act-by-Act Analysis (Acts I, II, III)

Act I Analysis

Setting the Scene

• The play opens in the Birling family dining room, described as “substantial and heavily comfortable, but not cosy and homelike.” This symbolizes the family’s wealth but also their lack of warmth or genuine compassion.
• Lighting begins “pink and intimate” but becomes “brighter and harder” with the Inspector’s arrival—foreshadowing the exposure of uncomfortable truths.

Character Introductions

• Arthur Birling: A self-important businessman, giving pompous speeches about the impossibility of war and the Titanic being “unsinkable.” This dramatic irony makes him appear foolish to the 1946 audience.
• Sybil Birling: Cold, socially superior, and condescending.
• Sheila Birling: Naïve but excitable; soon becomes more thoughtful.
• Eric Birling: Awkward, immature, and defensive, hinting at hidden guilt.
• Gerald Croft: Confident and charming, but evasive.
• Inspector Goole: Arrives abruptly, immediately commanding attention with his “massiveness, solidity, and purposefulness.”

Plot Development

• Inspector reveals Eva Smith’s suicide, and one by one, family members are implicated.
• Arthur Birling: Fired Eva from his factory after she demanded fair wages. He refuses to accept responsibility.
• Sheila Birling: Confesses to having Eva dismissed from Milwards out of jealousy. She is horrified when she realizes her actions contributed to Eva’s downfall, saying: “I felt rotten about it at the time, and now I feel a lot worse.”

Themes in Act I

• Social Responsibility vs. Individualism – Birling’s “a man has to mind his own business” contrasts with the Inspector’s collective message.
• Class Prejudice – Eva’s dismissal highlights the vulnerability of working-class women.
• Generational Divide – Sheila is receptive to the Inspector’s moral lesson, unlike her father.

---

Act II Analysis

Escalation of Conflict

The Inspector turns his attention to Gerald and Sybil, deepening the tension. Sheila increasingly takes the Inspector’s side, urging honesty: “You mustn’t try to build up a kind of wall between us and that girl.”

Key Revelations

• Gerald Croft: Admits to having an affair with Eva (as “Daisy Renton”). He provided her with temporary comfort and financial help, but ultimately abandoned her. Though he shows regret, his attempt to hide the truth damages his engagement with Sheila.
• Sybil Birling: Revealed as the cruelest of all. As chair of a women’s charity, she refused Eva’s desperate appeal for help, dismissing her as impertinent and undeserving. Ironically, Sybil condemns the man responsible for Eva’s pregnancy, unknowingly describing her own son, Eric.

Themes in Act II

• Hypocrisy of Respectability – Gerald and Sybil maintain appearances while engaging in immoral behavior.
• Gender & Power – Gerald uses his wealth and status to control Eva’s circumstances. Sybil uses her authority in charity to exert moral judgment.
• Foreshadowing – Sybil’s condemnation of the absent father sets up Eric’s explosive confession in Act III.

---

Act III Analysis

Climax and Revelation

• Eric Birling: Confesses he forced himself on Eva while drunk, stole money from his father’s business to support her, and left her pregnant. His guilt devastates Sheila and horrifies the audience.
• The Inspector delivers his final moral lesson, warning the Birlings:
  “We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.”
  This is Priestley’s direct warning to post-war Britain.

Falling Action

• After the Inspector leaves, Gerald investigates and claims the Inspector was a fraud. Mr. and Mrs. Birling cling to this revelation, desperate to protect their reputation.
• Sheila and Eric, however, refuse to dismiss the moral truth: “It doesn’t make any real difference whether he was a police inspector or not. The point is, you don’t seem to have learnt anything.”

Twist Ending

The relief is short-lived: the telephone rings. A girl has just died, and an inspector is on his way. The cycle begins again, leaving the audience with an unresolved sense of moral urgency.

Themes in Act III

• Generational Divide – Sharpest here. The older generation laugh off responsibility; the younger accept it.
• Truth vs. Illusion – The Inspector’s identity remains ambiguous, but his message is undeniable.
• Moral Consequence – Priestley suggests that history will repeat itself until lessons of social responsibility are learned.

---

Core Themes in An Inspector Calls

1. Social Responsibility

The Inspector’s famous speech—“We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other”—is the moral heart of the play. Priestley attacks the Birlings’ selfish individualism, portraying Eva Smith’s death as the inevitable outcome of capitalist exploitation. Each character’s action contributes to her destruction, symbolizing how unchecked greed harms the vulnerable.

2. Class and Inequality

The Birlings embody Edwardian privilege and arrogance. Their dismissal of Eva as “girls of that class” reflects systemic injustice. Priestley highlights how working-class women had little protection against unemployment, poverty, and exploitation, while the wealthy insulated themselves from consequence.

3. Generational Divide

• Older Generation (Arthur & Sybil): Prioritize reputation over morality, refusing to admit wrongdoing. They embody entrenched conservatism.
• Younger Generation (Sheila & Eric): Open to change and capable of remorse. Sheila grows into a voice of conscience, while Eric condemns his parents’ hypocrisy.
• Gerald Croft: Straddles both worlds—momentarily regretful but ultimately eager to preserve the status quo.

4. Guilt and Denial

The family moves from denial → confession → renewed denial after Gerald exposes the Inspector as a “hoax.” Priestley critiques human evasiveness—only Sheila and Eric internalize the lesson, while their parents revert to self-preservation.

---

Characters as Social Symbols

• Arthur Birling: Capitalist arrogance personified. His speeches about “lower costs and higher prices” and rejection of collective responsibility expose him as greedy and shortsighted. Dramatic irony undermines him: he declares the Titanic “unsinkable” and dismisses war, both false to the 1946 audience.

• Sybil Birling: Represents cold charity. As head of a women’s charity, she denies Eva aid out of prejudice. Her hypocrisy highlights the emptiness of class-based morality.

• Sheila Birling: Symbol of hope and change. Initially shallow, she evolves into a voice of conscience, admitting her fault and urging her family to accept responsibility: “You’re pretending everything’s just as it was before.”

• Eric Birling: His alcoholism, theft, and exploitation of Eva reveal the destructive consequences of neglect and privilege. Yet, his eventual remorse aligns him with Priestley’s vision of a socially responsible younger generation.

• Gerald Croft: Opportunistic yet charming. His affair with Eva/Daisy is transactional, though he offers temporary kindness. His eagerness to dismiss the Inspector’s legitimacy shows his true loyalty to status and comfort.

• Inspector Goole: More than a policeman, he is Priestley’s mouthpiece for socialist ideals. His name suggests “ghoul,” hinting at a supernatural or allegorical role. He uses psychological pressure, symbolism, and moral authority to expose the family’s complicity.

• Eva Smith/Daisy Renton: Never seen on stage, yet central to the play. She represents the working-class poor whose suffering is ignored by the wealthy. Her multiple identities reflect the invisibility of marginalized women.

---

Dramatic Techniques

1. Structure & Timing:

   • The play follows the well-made play format, confined to one location with continuous action.
   • Each act reveals a new link in Eva’s story, creating a “chain of events.”
   • Real-time unfolding increases tension and claustrophobia.

2. Dramatic Irony:
   Birling’s misplaced optimism about the Titanic and the impossibility of war creates irony for audiences who know history proved him wrong.

3. Symbolism:

   • Lighting: From “pink and intimate” to “brighter and harder” as the Inspector arrives, symbolizing exposure and truth.
   • Engagement Ring: Represents broken illusions of unity; Sheila’s rejection of it mirrors her moral awakening.
   • Photograph: Goole shows it selectively, leaving ambiguity about Eva’s identity and questioning truth itself.

4. Dialogue & Subtext:
   Interruptions, pauses, and hidden tensions reveal guilt before confession (e.g., Eric’s drunken defensiveness foreshadows his role).

5. The Ending:
   The “hoax” offers false relief, but the final phone call reinstates accountability. Priestley warns that unless society reforms, history will repeat in “fire and blood and anguish.”

---

Historical Context

• Set in 1912: A world of rigid class divisions, just before WWI and the sinking of the Titanic.
• Written in 1945: After WWII, with Britain seeking reform. Priestley promoted the idea of a welfare state and collective responsibility.
• The Inspector embodies socialist ideals, warning against the selfishness that led to two world wars.

An Inspector Calls Act-by-Act  Key Quotes

---

Act I Analysis

Key Developments

• The Birlings celebrate Sheila’s engagement.
• Inspector Goole arrives, revealing Eva Smith’s suicide.
• Arthur and Sheila are implicated in her downfall.

Key Quotes & Analysis

1. Arthur Birling on self-interest:
   “A man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own.”
   • This line summarizes Birling’s capitalist philosophy. Priestley condemns it by showing how Birling’s refusal to take responsibility contributes to Eva’s death.

2. Dramatic irony – Titanic:
   “The Titanic—she sails next week—unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable.”
   • The 1946 audience knows the Titanic sank in 1912. Priestley uses irony to undermine Birling’s authority, exposing him as arrogant and foolish.

3. Sheila’s remorse:
   “I felt rotten about it at the time and now I feel a lot worse.”
   • Sheila admits guilt for getting Eva dismissed from Milwards. Unlike her parents, she accepts moral responsibility, showing Priestley’s faith in the younger generation.

---

Act II Analysis

Key Developments

• Gerald confesses his affair with Eva/Daisy.
• Sybil Birling is revealed to have denied Eva help from her charity.
• Tensions rise between the generations.

Key Quotes & Analysis

1. Sheila’s warning to her family:
   “You mustn’t try to build up a kind of wall between us and that girl. If you do, then the Inspector will just break it down.”
   • Sheila recognizes the Inspector’s power and the futility of denial. Symbolically, she points to class divisions that must be dismantled.

2. Gerald on his affair:
   “She told me she had to leave the place she was living. She hadn’t any money left. She was desperately hard up.”
   • Gerald presents himself as Eva’s rescuer, but the relationship is transactional. Priestley critiques how men of privilege exploit women under the guise of charity.

3. Sybil’s hypocrisy:
   “As if a girl of that sort would ever refuse money!”
   • Sybil reveals her class prejudice, dismissing Eva as unworthy. Her cold judgment reflects how charity organizations often reinforced inequality instead of alleviating it.

---

Act III Analysis

Key Developments

• Eric confesses to drunkenly exploiting Eva and stealing money.
• Inspector delivers his final moral sermon.
• The family splits over whether to accept responsibility.
• The shocking twist ending reveals another inspector is on his way.

Key Quotes & Analysis

1. Eric on responsibility:
   “You’re not the kind of father a chap could go to when he’s in trouble.”
   • Eric exposes Arthur’s failures as a father. Priestley highlights how lack of compassion within families mirrors wider social neglect.

2. The Inspector’s final warning:
   “We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And the time will come when, if men will not learn that lesson, they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.”
   • This is the play’s moral climax. “Fire and blood and anguish” alludes to both World Wars, which Priestley suggests were caused by selfishness and inequality.

3. Sheila rejects denial:
   “You’re pretending everything’s just as it was before.”
   • Sheila refuses to dismiss the Inspector’s lesson, unlike her parents. Her growth symbolizes hope for social change.

4. Twist ending:
   “That was the police. A girl has just died—on her way to the Infirmary—after swallowing some disinfectant. And a police inspector is on his way here.”
   • The cyclical structure emphasizes Priestley’s warning: if society ignores its responsibilities, history will repeat itself.

---

Conclusion

By weaving together quotes and analysis, Priestley ensures that each act drives home his political and moral message. Act I exposes the family’s flaws, Act II deepens their complicity, and Act III forces the audience to confront the consequences of ignoring social responsibility.

The quotes reinforce key themes of class inequality, generational conflict, and collective accountability, making An Inspector Calls one of the most powerful plays of the 20th century.

---

Conclusion

An Inspector Calls is far more than a detective story—it is a political allegory, a morality play, and a social critique. Priestley exposes the dangers of capitalism, hypocrisy, and denial while urging empathy and accountability.

The younger generation’s willingness to change offers a glimmer of hope, but the cyclical ending reinforces the urgency of Priestley’s warning: if society ignores its interconnectedness, destruction is inevitable.