LANGUAGE PLANNING, MAINTENANCE, SHIFT, DEATH

0
Also Read

 INTRODUCTION


Language, just like any other natural resource must be planned in order to ensure its appropriate utilisation. The challenges of language planning are more evident in multilingual settings where several languages exist side  by  side.  Language  is  planned  so  that  the  users  can  derive  the maximum benefits from such languages.


In this unit, we shall be examining the idea of language development and  planning.  In  addition,  we  shall  also  look  at  language  shift  and language death.


3.1     Language Development and Language Maintenance


Language, like any other phenomenon develops, advances and is better organised  in terms  of its  functions. Just like  any  other phenomenon, language has to be maintained if it has to grow and use more effectively. Language  is  a  crucial  part  of  a  people’s  culture  and  a  powerful instrument for preserving and transmitting values and systems from one generation  to  another.  People  with  a  well-developed  language  will naturally   be   developed   because   language   is   the   vehicle   for   the expression of concepts in our culture. Well-maintained languages will naturally develop in terms of the roles and functions they are used to perform.


3.1.1  Language Planning


Language planning refers to deliberate efforts to influence the behaviour of  others  with  respect  to  the  acquisition,   structure  or   functional allocation of languages. It involves the development of goals, objectives

and strategies to change the way language is used in a community.

Language planning involves the following:


(a)      Evaluation: placing value on language. Such values may result in

its selection and assignment of roles.

(b)      Regulation: controlling language by means of rules and policies.

This then determines the extent to which such a language can be used.

(c)      Decision making: choice and judgment on what is best to do at a point  in time.  This presupposes  that there  were problems  and difficulties.


Language planning is not only done by the society, it is also done by individual  bilingual  or  multilingual,  who  makes  conscious  choice  of what language to use at any particular time.


The  basis  of language  planning  is  that  the  society  needs  common publicly standardised language. The objective is to establish, maintain and develop such a language. Language planning is more necessary in multilingual settings, typically in Africa and Asia. In such multilingual communities, the choice of a common language among the indigenous languages for inter-ethnic communication is always a difficult task. The result is the adoption of a neutral language, typically, the language of the ex-colonial rulers for political stability. Language planning leads to the adoption of language policy by the government.


Language planning usually  takes place  through  government  agencies and academic centers. The typical tasks of such agencies are to:


(a)      devise orthographies for unwritten languages

(b)      revise spelling systems

(c)      coin new words

(d)      produce literature and textbooks in the language.

In developing nations, the first task in language planning is to determine which  language  or  languages  should  perform  the  role  of  national language.  This  is  called  language  selection.  The  government  also considers the roles  of the minority languages. By assigning minority languages certain roles, they are helped to develop and not decay. Other things  done  in  the  process  of  language  development  include  the following:


(a)      Codification:  making  explicit  statements  on  the  code  through dictionaries, grammars, pronunciation, spelling, punctuation and pronunciation guides. Codification leads to the establishment of a standard variety.

(b)      Graphisation:  the  reduction  of spoken  language  to  writing  or devising graphic symbols to represent the spoken form. The first decision in graphisation is the choice of alphabet or scripts

(c)      Modernisation:  Making  the  language  to  belong  to  the  world community of languages that can express modern terminologies. This will necessitate the expansion of the lexicon and creation of lexical items to talk about the modern scientific and industrial world


3.1.2  Factors Influencing Language Planning


Certain factors influence the planning of language in any community. They are discussed below:


(a)       Socio-demographic factors: The number of languages spoken, the

number  of speakers,  and  the  geographical  distribution  of the languages.

(a)      Linguistic   factors:   similarities   and   dis-similarities   between languages, the  degree  of modernized development, the literary tradition.

(b)      Socio-psychological  factors:  Attitudes  of people  towards  their language and towards other languages around them.

(c)      Religious factors: The functions of the languages in relation to the  religious  inclinations  in  the  community.  For  instance,  the Christian   mission   promoted   the   local   languages   for   their evangelical interest.


SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISE


Choose two African countries, two Asian countries and two European countries and describe how they planned their languages.



3.2     Language Shift


It is sometime referred to as language transfer. Language shift is the process whereby an entire speech community shifts to speaking another language.  Language  shift  is  determined  by  the  rate  of assimilation, which refers to the percentage of individuals with a given mother tongue who  speak  another  language  often  at  home.  The process  whereby  a community  of speakers  of a  language  becomes  bilingual  in  another language, and gradually shift allegiance to the second language is called assimilation. When language shift involves the loss of the first language, it can lead to cultural disintegration and a variety of social problems.


Language  shift results mostly when  language  is not maintained.  The ultimate result of shift is language death. The language users  simply become a sub-set of speakers of another language. The rate at which a language  is transferred to  another generation  determines whether the language will survive, shift or ultimately die. For instance in Nigeria, quite a number of educated parents  are bringing up their children as monolingual speakers of English. This may eventually lead to language shift by the time the generations of the children of these speakers grow up.  They  will  eventually  bring  up  their  own  children  in  the  same manner.


3.3     Language Death


Language  death  also known  as  language  extinction  is  a process that affects  speech  communities where the  level  of linguistic  competence that speakers possess of a given language is decreased. Language death may manifest itself in the following ways:


(a)      gradual language death;

(b)      total language death;

(c)      sudden language death (linguicide)


Gradual language death is a process in which a language is being lost as a result of the speakers’ abandonment of such language.


Total language death occurs when no speaker of a particular language remains where the language was previously used (i.e, all native speakers die.


Sudden language death occurs when all the speakers of a language are wiped out through genocide or any natural disaster.


The  most  common  process  of  language  death  is  one  in  which  a community of speakers of one language becomes bilingual in another


language and gradually shifts allegiance to the second language until they  cease  to  use  their  original  language.  This  process  is  called assimilation. It may be voluntary or forced. A language is effectively dead when it is no longer used actively for communication. This may not necessarily mean that all the speakers have died.


Language death is a slow process. For instance, when all a language has left are a few elderly speakers, such a language is declared moribund and the process of its death has already begun. When each generation learns less of their first language and more of their second language, the language has  started the process  of death. A  stage in the process  of language death is language attrition – the loss of a portion of a particular language by the speech community.


4.0     CONCLUSION


Language  is  like  any  other  human  resource  and  if  it  is  not  well maintained and developed, it could be lost. The process of language loss begins with the attitude of the speakers of the language to their language and other languages around them. For instance, if the speakers have a negative attitude to their own language and a positive attitude to another language, the tendency is that they would lose their language for the other language. The extreme of language loss is language death, when the language ceases being used by anybody.


5.0     SUMMARY


In  this unit, we  examined the  concept  of language  maintenance  and development  and  how  these  affect  language  retention  and  loss.  We discussed how planning helps to make  a  language  develop. We  also looked at the role of attitudes in determining language development. We observed that language death is hardly a sudden phenomenon (though there  may  be  rare  instances  of  sudden  language  loss  if  a  whole community  of speakers  is  wiped  out).  Language  death  begins  as  a process from negative attitude to linguistic attrition, to shift and then death.


6.0     TUTOR-MARKED ASSIGNMENT


1.        What is language planning?

2.        Discuss factors that influence language planning.

3.        Explain the process of language shift.

4.        How does a language die?

5.        Identify those things that can be done in order to make a language to develop.


7.0     REFERENCES/FURTHER READING


Adegbite, W. (2003). ‘Mulitiligualism and national Development”. In: L.  Oyeleye  &  M.  Olateju.  (Eds).  Readings  in  Language  and Literature. Ile-Ife: OAU Press.


Fishman,    J.    (2000).    “Can    Threatened    Languages   be    Saved?”

Multilingual Matters.


Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.


Rigsby B. J. (1987). “Indigenous Language Shift and Maintenance In Fourth World Setting.” Multilingual Matters,  6. 4.


Sacks,  H.  Schegloff,  E.A.  &  Jeffersons,  G.  (1974).  “A  Simplest Systematics     for    the     Organisation     of    Turn-Taking     in Conversation”. Language, Vol. 50, Number 4, pp 696-735.

Post a Comment

0Comments

Leave a comment behind

Post a Comment (0)

#buttons=(Ok, Go it!) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn more
Ok, Go it!